Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael van der Riet's avatar

When I started digging my first surprise was that IVF births in the US are about ten times higher the percentage of total births than I'd imagined. In less-prosperous countries the number will be lower and globally the statistic probably approaches my first estimate.

IVF is necessary for embryo editing which will necessarily remain fairly rare for some time to come. That is probably the cause of the Designer Babies furore. The procedure will largely be available to a small privileged elite that can afford it. As an idealist who would like to see science giving the world healthier babies I feel very bad saying this, but it's economic reality.

The odds of embryo editing becoming available to all may be very low indeed. The odds that embryo editing will be possible without IVF may be infinitely small.

Because I'm a science fiction future optimist, I'd like to imagine a world of active genetic alteration made possible in normal pregnancy or even after birth.

Expand full comment

No posts