Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joe Shirley's avatar

Great analysis, thanks Matt! I'm compelled to add a bit more to widen the frame here, drawing from my own experience.

From my position as an independent researcher far outside the academic community, here's what stands out to me. Every researcher included in the studies above was an integral participant in the academic system. In order to get to the point in their career where they were proposing novel research, they underwent years of training within existing research protocols and theory, built relationships with those active in the field, and carefully learned how to position their ideas in such a way as to elevate their status and support their career goals. Through every part of this, they were rewarded for hewing to the existing paradigms.

This strong social reinforcement has a way of shaping our thinking. It becomes much harder to nurture the outlying idea when those around you are invested in the standard norms and so much of your time and life energy has to go toward work that is better supported, simply to keep your career viable, the funding steady, your status intact, and your relationships sturdy. I can't imagine the difficulty of trying to introduce a truly novel direction within such a strongly interwoven community of standards.

I faced this 30 years ago, when I discovered something completely outside the box that had the potential to introduce a new direction of research in psychology and cognitive science, but had no place to land in the existing fields. I was faced with a choice: go back to school and face many years of trying to work within a department and under advisors whose work had nothing to do with my discovery before earning the freedom to start my innovative research, or stay outside the system and see what I could accomplish. I chose the second.

Now, I'm in a place where I honestly have no idea how I might introduce this innovation into the field. It remains invisible, outside the realm of the known to those invested in the current ways of thinking. Yet it has great potential to bring a powerfully generative disruption to research.

What might you (or other readers) recommend? How might it be possible for me to find someone in academia who would be open enough to my work to consider collaborating on a first-step project, for example, that would have the potential for publication?

Expand full comment

No posts